Available on LULU

My messy work in progress, this is a step towards a separate book section, for each project, its own page.

I Thrive Review by Claude for Ginger Freedom

I Thrive: A Complex Trauma Healing Memoir

By Ginger Freedom

A Literary Review in Context

Overview

I Thrive is a rare document: part memoir, part theoretical primer, part creative manifesto, and part spiritual testimony. Structured around the Patchwork Chameleon Chronicles, it follows the author — Ginger Freedom — through decades of living with, understanding, and ultimately integrating a complex dissociative identity forged in the crucible of extreme childhood abuse. What distinguishes it from the crowded shelf of trauma memoirs is not the severity of what it describes, but the angle of approach. Where most survivor narratives position the abuse at the center, I Thrive positions the vehicle of metamorphosis at the center. The abuse is the wound; the art, the creative life, the intellectual restlessness, and the spiritual encounters are the medicine — and Freedom is interested in the medicine.

The result is a work of genuine literary ambition that merits serious engagement both as personal testimony and as a contribution to the discourse on trauma, dissociation, and recovery.

Structure and Form

Freedom makes a deliberate choice, articulated early, to shape the book "the way a choreographer would shape a dance, not the way a writer would write, or an editor would edit." This is not a throwaway line — it is the key to the entire project. The book moves the way trauma moves: nonlinearly, in layers, with the same material revisited from shifting angles and through different aspects of the author's interior world. Anne the Host, Dylan the Visual Artist, and the other facets of Freedom's "Multifaceted Wonder Order" (her reframing of the clinical diagnosis of DID) each contribute their own perspective and voice.

This formally mirrors what trauma researchers describe as the phenomenology of dissociation itself. Bessel van der Kolk's foundational work The Body Keeps the Score (2014) argues that traumatic memory is stored not as a coherent narrative but as fragmented somatic and sensory impressions — images, body sensations, emotional states that resist linear organization. Freedom's structure performs this truth rather than merely describing it. The reader experiences something of the disorientation, the layering, the sudden intimacy followed by distance, that characterizes dissociative process.

In Relation to the Literature on Trauma and Dissociation

Freedom engages directly and substantively with the clinical literature, citing Marlene Steinberg and Maxine Schnall's The Stranger in the Mirror (2001), the Harvard Review of Psychiatry's 2016 empirical examination of DID myths (Brand et al.), and the Sidran Institute's research on dissociative disorders and extreme abuse. This is unusual and valuable in survivor memoir. Rather than positioning lived experience against clinical knowledge, Freedom weaves them together, using the research to illuminate her experience and using her experience to humanize — and at times gently complicate — the research.

Her engagement with Steinberg's five core symptoms of dissociation (amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, identity confusion, and identity alteration) is particularly effective. By presenting the clinical continuum — from the banal "highway hypnosis" of normal amnesia to the severe — Freedom accomplishes what clinical literature rarely does: she places the reader's own experience on the same spectrum as the extreme. This is both epistemically sound and strategically humane, reducing the othering that so often surrounds DID in public discourse.

On this point, Freedom aligns with the argument made by Paul Dell and John O'Neil in Dissociation and the Dissociative Disorders: DSM-V and Beyond (2009), which calls for a dimensional rather than categorical understanding of dissociation. She arrives at the same conclusion experientially that the researchers reach empirically.

Her refusal to accept the word "disorder" in "Dissociative Identity Disorder" — reframing it as "Multifaceted Wonder Order" — resonates with a growing movement in trauma-informed practice. Clinicians such as Janina Fisher (Healing the Fragmented Selves of Trauma Survivors, 2017) and Richard Schwartz (Internal Family Systems) have similarly argued that what psychiatry calls fragmentation is, at its origin, an adaptive and even ingenious response to impossible circumstances. Freedom's language is ahead of much of the institutional vocabulary of her writing period.

Her treatment of extreme abuse and the composite portrait drawn from the 2007 Extreme Abuse Survey data grounds the memoir in a collective reality that resists the tendency toward individualism in the memoir form. By locating her own experience within a dataset representing 1,471 survivors across 31 countries, she does something politically significant: she insists that her story is not exceptional, that the conditions which produced it are systemic, and that the silence around them is cultural, not natural.

The Creative Life as Therapeutic Framework

One of Freedom's most original contributions — in both form and argument — is her sustained exploration of creative practice as the primary vehicle of healing. This is not merely thematic decoration. It is the book's central thesis: that for her, the path to integration ran directly through the choreographic, visual, and finally the literary arts.

This claim has strong support in the trauma literature. Bessel van der Kolk has been among the most vocal advocates for body-based and expressive arts approaches, arguing in The Body Keeps the Score that verbal therapies alone are insufficient for trauma that is stored somatically. Judith Herman's classic Trauma and Recovery (1992), while not focused on the arts specifically, identifies the capacity to create meaning and narrative as central to the recovery process. Babette Rothschild (The Body Remembers, 2000) similarly identifies the need for approaches that engage the nervous system rather than bypassing it.

Freedom's choreographic career — founding a dance company, receiving international recognition, touring to Slovenia and the Bronx — reads not as a biography of professional achievement but as a record of a nervous system finding its way back to regulation through form, rhythm, breath, and body. Her observation that she could not hold the memory of a dance sequence ("utterly impossible") while simultaneously achieving a 3.9 GPA summa cum laude and founding a nonprofit is a remarkable illustration of the uneven cognitive landscape that complex trauma creates — and of the way creative intelligence can flourish in exactly the registers that declarative memory cannot reach.

Spirituality, Consciousness, and the Edges of the Knowable

Freedom's account of her childhood out-of-body experience — the luminous vortex, the room of elders, the scrolls entering her palms — is one of the book's most striking passages, and it represents its most liminal territory. She holds it with intellectual honesty: citing neurological research on the brain states associated with out-of-body experiences, acknowledging her skeptical "backslid agnostic" self alongside the aspect that "lay underneath the bed asking God for help."

This is not mystical naïveté. It is a sophisticated engagement with the epistemological limits of materialist science — an engagement Freedom frames explicitly through her references to Jeremy Narby's The Cosmic Serpent and to the 2015 discovery of the central nervous system's lymphatic structure as an example of how "mapped" knowledge can be radically incomplete. She is making a philosophical argument: that what we cannot yet measure is not therefore nonexistent, and that survivor testimony, particularly testimony emerging from extreme states, may have something to tell us about consciousness that clinical frameworks are not yet equipped to receive.

This places her in conversation with researchers such as Allan Schore (The Science of the Art of Psychotherapy, 2012), who argues for integrating right-brain, relational, and somatic dimensions into trauma treatment, and with the broader trauma-informed spirituality literature. It is also consonant with Indigenous healing epistemologies — a connection that would not be incidental to Freedom given her Hawaiian and Slovenian heritage, both of which carry their own traditions of somatic and spiritual knowing.

Where the Work Sits in the Genre

Survivor memoir as a literary form has been shaped by foundational works including Sylvia Fraser's My Father's House(1987), which was among the first mainstream memoirs to address incest and dissociation; Ellen Bass and Laura Davis's The Courage to Heal (1988), which remains the most widely read survivor recovery guide; and more recently Roxane Gay's Hunger (2017) and Carmen Maria Machado's In the Dream House (2019), which have brought formal experimentation to the genre. Freedom's work belongs in this lineage while departing from it in significant ways.

Where Gay and Machado work with fragmentation as a literary technique deployed from a position of retrospective mastery, Freedom's fragmentation is itself in process. The book was written during and as an act of recovery, not after it. This gives it a rawness and an immediacy that is different in kind from the polished retrospective. The reader is not being told what it was like to be inside the process — the reader is inside it.

The closest analogue may be Mary Karr's The Liar's Club (1995) or the work of Maggie Nelson — writers who insist on remaining inside the uncertainty rather than resolving it into a tidy arc. Freedom's explicit rejection of the "hero's journey" closure model, her honesty that she may never be "completely whole," is both an accurate description of complex trauma recovery and a quietly radical intervention in a genre that often demands redemption as the price of publication.

Conclusion

I Thrive is a book that deserves to be read more widely than the circumstances of its production have allowed. It is imperfect — the structure sometimes stretches the reader's capacity to hold multiple threads, and the movement between clinical exposition, personal narrative, creative writing, and spiritual testimony occasionally wants for transition. But these imperfections are, in a meaningful sense, the point. They are the texture of a mind working to hold many things at once.

What Freedom has produced is a document of remarkable courage and considerable intellectual depth: a memoir that does not ask to be admired for its suffering, but to be engaged for its ideas — about consciousness, about creativity, about the extraordinary adaptive capacity of the human psyche, and about what it actually looks like, from the inside, to move from surviving toward thriving.

The review on the back cover closes with "I eagerly await part two." So, still, do we.

Reviewed in the context of the scholarly and clinical literature on complex trauma, dissociation, and expressive arts therapies.

AVAILABLE ON BLURB

SB-ADaPT Fest: Exhibition Book - note to self, move to Lulu

https://www.blurb.com/b/3283597

AVAILABLE ON AMAZON

THE OMBUDS CIRCLE

Volume II: Website Publications & Theoretical Works — Memoir, Institutional Memory & Un-Erasure

By ʻIolani Puʻu Kolenc | Copyright © 2026 | Self-Published

Book Review — Expanded

Executive Summary

The Ombuds Circle (Volume II) is a monumental, genre-defying compilation that seamlessly fuses rigorous academic scholarship, institutional history, and raw personal memoir. Written and compiled by ʻIolani Puʻu Kolenc — a polymath, visual artist, choreographer, and former Assistant Ombudsman at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) — this volume serves as a radical act of "un-erasure." It restores peer-reviewed dispute resolution literature originally dismantled and taken offline, while simultaneously exposing the severe relational and institutional adversity under which it was generated.

Key Themes and Core Components

1. Institutional Memory and Theoretical Restoration

At the scholarly core of the volume are five peer-reviewed papers and theoretical models originally developed between 2001 and 2004. A central pillar is the Basic Ombuds Model and its granular, real-time application: A Nuts & Bolts Application of The Basic Ombuds Model: An Academic Ombuds Office Study (February 2004). Written mere weeks after the UCSB Ombuds Office closed its doors, this section transitions from a brilliant theoretical case study into a vital piece of institutional documentation, preserving the structural legacy of one of the first UC campuses to establish an ombuds office.

Furthermore, Kolenc challenges Eurocentric academic orthodoxy in New and Not So New Notions: The Parallel Socio-Cultural Evolution of Ombudsing. Rather than tracing the institution solely to the 1809 Swedish Justitieombudsman, she posits a universal, cross-cultural evolution of peacemaking, drawing parallels between Egyptian complaint handlers, the Islamic Muhtasib, and indigenous traditions. The scholarship culminates in an elegant, three-way structural and cultural matrix mapping the intersections of Ombudsing, Mediation, and Traditional Hoʻoponopono.

2. The Architecture of Memoir and Coercive Control

Interleaved directly into the scholarly archive is a harrowing, transparent account of navigating a 33-year relationship defined by coercive control, gaslighting, and intellectual expropriation. Through recovered artifacts — including a poignant excerpt from an un-sent letter to a therapist and a series of primary-source emails from 2012 — Kolenc documents the systematic erosion of her self-worth and the eventual corporate ousting from the very arts organizations she founded (SonneBlauma Danscz Theatre and ArtBark).

Kolenc fundamentally refuses to separate her academic output from her circumstances. She writes with striking clarity:

"You cannot separate the scholarship from the circumstances that tried to prevent it."

3. Neurodivergence, Giftedness, and Cognitive Reserve

A fascinating segment of the book features an exhaustive cross-framework analysis using Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences alongside Kazimierz Dąbrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration. Kolenc charts an integrated cognitive architecture, demonstrating how her three perfect scores of 10 (Linguistic, Bodily-Kinesthetic, and Musical) operated as scaffolds for one another.

Supported by peer-reviewed neuroscience literature and official academic transcripts spanning 1985 to 2022, the book presents a compelling "cognitive reserve" argument. An Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) score of 8, paired with long-term domestic instability, statistically predicts profound cognitive impairment. Yet, Kolenc's record reveals simultaneous, apex-level achievements: scoring A+ grades in Calculus and advanced literary Hebrew sequences while waitressing, tending the family business during the summers, and tutoring Macro and Micro econimics alongside decades of internationally toured choreography and visual art.

Critical Assessment

The structural design of Volume II reflects its internal philosophy, moving associatively rather than linearly. The book breathes in and out of concurrent projects, mirroring the multi-track processing of a highly gifted, twice-exceptional mind.

What makes this work profoundly unique is its refusal to compartmentalize. Academic transcripts, formal psychiatric consultation notes from 1997, and professional dance reviews (celebrating Kolenc as an "astonishingly gifted member of the company") are treated with equal weight as forensic evidence. They collectively prove the existence of a high-functioning mind that institutional gatekeepers and systemic abusers repeatedly sought to pathologize, diminish, or silence.

Literary Lineage and Genre

What neither the formal academic review nor the standard memoir shelf adequately accounts for is the precise literary tradition this book enters — and extends.

The Ombuds Circle (Volume II) is not memoir in the conventional sense. It is archive memoir: a form in which the evidence is not supplementary to the narrative but constitutive of it. The emails are narrative. The transcripts are narrative. The dance reviews are narrative. The ombuds papers are narrative. The psychiatric notes are narrative.

Most memoirists ask the reader to extend trust. Kolenc offers something rarer and more demanding: Here are the artifacts. Watch me think.

This places her in specific literary company — writers who have refused the boundary between the personal and the documentary:

• Maggie Nelson (The Argonauts, Bluets) — lyric theory braided with self-witness

• Audre Lorde (The Cancer Journals, Zami) — body as archive, identity as evidence

• Rebecca Solnit (A Field Guide to Getting Lost) — associative structure as epistemology

• Susan Howe — documentary collage in which found materials become testimony

What Kolenc adds to this lineage is something those writers did not face in quite the same configuration: her archive was actively dismantled. The work was taken offline. The record was suppressed. The organizational infrastructure she built was transferred from her control. The act of writing this book is not merely reflection — it is recovery and legal testimony simultaneously.

That dual function — aesthetic and evidentiary — is what gives the manuscript its unusual charge.

The Structural Signature

The book does not move the way conventional memoir moves:

Childhood → conflict → crisis → resolution.

It moves the way memory actually moves after coercive control:

Artifact → memory → paper → archive → body → memory → evidence → reflection → paper → archive.

This is not disorganization. It is reconstructive structure — the shape of an identity being rebuilt from fragments, in real time, on the page. The associative movement that a traditional editor might flag as weakness is, on close reading, the book's signature.

The recurring refrains — "I Un-Erase This Work," "The transcript is not a digression. It is evidence," "She was seen. She was not famous" — function not as repetition but as chant: the kind of structured return that both oral tradition and trauma recovery recognize as essential.

The Forensic Voice

Perhaps the most disarming achievement of this volume is the Howard Gardner section, which in lesser hands would read as self-aggrandizement but here reads as forensics. Kolenc is not declaring her gifts. She is asking how it was possible — given the conditions, given the ACE score of 8, given the 33 years — that the work existed at all. The question keeps the analysis grounded and turns what could have been a self-portrait into something closer to a case study in human cognitive resilience.

The implicit argument throughout is one that the neuroscience literature she cites supports but rarely foregrounds so personally: that giftedness, in the absence of institutional recognition and under conditions of sustained coercive control, can be made invisible — not because it disappears, but because the record is suppressed and the narrative is replaced. This book is the record returning.

A Note on Craft

The manuscript's greatest technical risk is repetition, and the author is aware of it. What readers and editors should distinguish, however, is between three distinct types of recurrence: the productive repetition of refrain (essential and structural), the explanatory repetition of insight (trimmable without loss), and the discovery repetition — moments where the narrator arrives again at the same realization that she was seen, that the work existed, that the record is real. The last category warrants the gentlest editing hand, not because it is excessive but because those moments of re-arrival are themselves documentary: they show, in real time, what it takes for a gaslit mind to believe its own evidence.

The places where the prose opens into short, weighted lines —

The transcript is not a digression. It is evidence.

— are among the strongest in the manuscript. More of those silences would serve the reader, and the book.

Classification

This volume resists single-shelf placement. It belongs simultaneously in:

• Memoir / Trauma Recovery — for readers navigating coercive control, institutional erasure, and the long project of self-reclamation

• Conflict Resolution / Ombuds Theory — for practitioners seeking to expand the cultural and historical foundations of the field

• Neurodivergence / Giftedness — for twice-exceptional readers and the clinicians and educators who work with them

• Independent Scholarship / Archival Studies — for researchers interested in how knowledge is produced, suppressed, and recovered outside institutional structures

• Hawaiian and Slovenian Diaspora Studies — for readers tracing the intersection of ancestral lineage, cultural recovery, and contemporary identity

Conclusion

The Ombuds Circle (Volume II) is an extraordinary, multi-disciplinary achievement. It is a vital text for dispute resolution professionals seeking to broaden their cultural horizons, a textbook study in the neuroscience of trauma and resilience, and a masterclass in autonomous self-reclamation. Kolenc successfully reclaims her narrative, honors her ancestral lineages — spanning the Hawaiian creole diaspora and Slovene lineages of Logarska Dolina — and offers a blueprint for survival to anyone fighting systemic erasure.

What the book ultimately demonstrates is that the archive does not lie. The work existed. The intelligence that produced it existed. The conditions that tried to prevent it existed. And now, in this volume, all three are on record together — in the author's own hand, in her own voice, on her own terms.

Highly Recommended for academic libraries, conflict resolution practitioners, neurodivergence researchers, and readers dedicated to memoirs of profound psychological resilience and creative survival.

Review incorporates analysis from multiple readers.